WR Prompt 10: break up or make up?

For this post I want you to brainstorm 4 lists:

The first two are simply a honest, contemplative, and thorough list of the advantages and disadvantages of the role of the "corporate media" in our personal lives/ society at large. It's like when you know you have to break up with your boyfriend/ girlfriend but aren't sure why:) Minimum 10 each, maximum ??? This doesn't have to be complete sentences (unless it's necessary to explain nuances) but can be an itemized list.

A1- PROs
B1- CONs

Discuss your associations & the (direct and indirect) ramifications you see in each item of both lists.
This can be a list of various elements: associations (metaphors or more literal connections), emotional responses (rage/ indifference/ satisfaction, etc.), and a full consideration of the consequences (self-image, financial empowerment, exploitation,

A2- Associations & ramifications (direct and indirect) of the PROs
B2- Associations & ramifications (direct and indirect) of the CONs

You have plenty of ammunition supplied by Lasn and our discussions (albeit mostly on the negative side). Watching "The Corporation" will supply you with more. I want you to draw from these sources, (putting Lasn or whatever other source you reference in parentheses next to items that are direct references to his terminology- i.e. if you mention "infotoxins" or "jolts"), but ultimately these lists will reflect your take on the role of the corporate media in your lives. Write a section at the end summing up your conclusions. You might be leaning towards one bias or another, or maybe it's a mixed picture where you're split. Explain what going through this list/association made you think of; how did it solidify or destabilize your opinion of the corporation? Do you need to need to let him go or are you still in love? Or are there serious changes that need to happen to ensure trust and sustainability? enough with the relationship metaphor... go for it!

http://www.thecorporation.com/

Jenny's World Changing Responses 6 + 7

Giving Well

“Before most of us learned to talk, we learned to share.” This is definitely true. One of the first things we were learning is to share with friends or siblings. This principle completely applies to the cycle of global giving. Enabling philanthropy is an action that is extremely important. Small amounts of money given to causes that need them the most, and that they can be put to the best use. A few things are important with giving money. That the money goes directly to the cause you are donating to, that you give enough money to make an impact, and that the gift can expand itself contributing to a cycle. Though everyone believes that you can’t go wrong by giving, that isn’t the case. You can go wrong. If your money is misused, or not given to the cause it was set out to, or if it is not impacting the cause enough, it may not have been the best investment. I think it is important to be aware of the cause you are supporting. For instance, if you are donating to families in developing countries, your money should be going to them, so that they can use it to expand. Not to a foundation who gives a certain percent to them. There are so many causes that desperately need charity that misusing your money could lead to disaster. Philanthropy is extremely important tot making our goals to change the world work. Without donations, it couldn’t happen, but with these donations comes a responsibility to be aware and involved. Writing a blank check is great and all, but it isn’t so great if your money is being given away without any heart. Caring is also a key to donating.

Amplifying your voice

“Change begins when people speak up.” Without the opinions of our generation, progression is not going to occur. “Speaking up” can occur in many different forms. Blogging, Zines, the Internet, text messages. Each bit of action can make a difference. “Bridge blogging” is writing online for an audience beyond the immediate community, making an impact beyond just our community. Our voices need to be heard in larger communities for movements to happen. We may speak out among our peers, but it is important for our peers to spread a message. Examples are Ohmynews.com, which is a compilation of professional and volunteer reporters who cover current events. This way, there is a viewpoint of a professional, but also of someone who speaks for the masses. Though this movement is something that has been worked on by professionals and adults for years, we are the generation that is going to have to carry it on and continue. In order to change our world, we need to come up with a means to speak to our community. These methods are great at doing so. Can we come up with more to speak to a larger community? That’s our current challenge.

Weekly Response #9

Yu-Jen(Chris),Tsai
ADP 3
Discussion 005

Weekly Response #9

One of the acts in the Spring chapter in Culture Jam that I disagree with and at the same time feeling impractical would be the part where Lasn talks about the definition of the word “cool”(113). Even though Lasn’s main point and opinion in this book is obviously somehow warning the society about the huge corporations, which he define as something harmful and evil to the human world; in my point of view, several beliefs of his are still too judgmental. For an instance, in the first paragraph of the section when the author wrote that the marketers or the corporations got hold of it and reverse the word “cool’s” meaning and by the end of the passage, Lasn refer the phenomenon as poison to our society today by calling the word “cool” as opiate. Of course there are some products or any kind of material objects that are overhyped; however, we need to think about why do certain companies have the ability to grab the consumers’ attention–– quality for one. It’s just like the idea of any type of designers in today’s world; the main objective of a good design is “mass produce”. Famous Australian product designer Marc Newson said that a good design should in fact cost less instead of overpricing them during an interview in the famous documentary about design released couple months ago called Objectified. And so it is not the corporation’s fault since they simply want to make their product better. On the other hand, those companies that started off with fairly well designed and manufactured product and ultimately slacking would not have the slim chance of surviving in the competition.
Other Lasn’s revolution idea that I found could be practical enough or at least for the greater good to our world would be the MEME Wars section where Lasn listed out “five of the most potent metamemes currently in the culture jammer’s arsenal.” The last of the five is called Media Carta would be the most efficient out of the five due to the power of communication mediums in terms of today’s technology.
To finish it up, I would just like to bring up the idea of the relationship between the consumers and the corporations or companies. It is natural that people tend to have the urge of owing new things, which is what keep the corporations and designers operating and coming up with new ideas. However, in order to achieve Lasn’s ideal world, we, as consumers, will have to start from the beginning; it’s going to be time consuming. I think that to get to that point we will have to wait for a new generation and start from them to change the wide definition of the word “need” and “cool”. The new designers from our generation would be the only solution to change the relationship.

Work Cited :

Objectified (2009) Documentary-
Director:
Gary Hustwit
Lasn, Kalle. Culture Jam: The Uncooling of America

Weekly Response 9

Levester Williams
Reed Esslinger-Payet, GSI
Art-Design 250

Your Authentic Act

We Americans have become sequacious; our choices are no longer “the products of [our] own will” (Lasn 40). Moreover, we are ultimately being controlled by a corporate state that infiltrate and saturate our lifestyle with capitalist ideals of lethal consumption (Lasn 69). This mindset that has been interwoven in lives has detrimental effects on us individually—such as body image, dietary issues, etc.—as well as collectively via the destruction of our environment. For example, Diamond mentions how China is striding to live the lifestyles of a First World country (Diamond 372). Yet, with such a large population, China’s environmental problems run on a gamut from air pollution to human-induced natural disasters (Diamond 358).
Lasn asserts that we must not tolerate degradation from our consumerist culture, but detourns the American dream (Lasn 168). He states that we do this by creating a “spectacle of modern life” by creating unusual disruptions in our daily routines (Lasn 101). Some actions seem so radical or rude that I question its effectiveness to promote a radical change to our culture while others are quite reasonable.
One of the action Lasn listed to start such revolution to our culture is to have rage toward corporate salesman (and similar careers). Having rage not only creates friction with the person who you are interacting with, but it creates friction with how people view you. For example, to be rude to a salesman because he has a job from a corporation one despises is futile. People will probably characterize you as a pugnacious dogmatist. That person is directing his rage and energy at the wrong individual. Balaguer, the president of Dominican Republic several times, directed his rage towards the ones who was directly responsible for the environmental degradation, such as loggers and politicians (Diamond 343); thus, it was effective. He didn’t direct his rage only to the individual that work at sawmills, but at the corporations and the powerful figures who supported them.
I agree that reframing the debate does start a change. Lasn, in the “Reframe Rebate” section, says one do this by stating and acting as a concerned citizen when one is rallying against a corporation. By shifting yourselves from a protester to a citizen, others in the community are able to become more aroused to support the issue. For example, I remember when I wanted to participate in the cleanup of my hometown. The main message that facilitated me in this decision was a sign that simply said “This Is Your Community.” Knowing that I was part of that community, I had a responsibility to participate in the county-wide cleanup day. Everyone identifies oneselves as a citizen who belong to a community. However, not only would want to be identify as a protester due to it stigma.
I believe that the revolutionary actions are successful at some level. Lasn mentions how a judge, acting as a private citizen, dissolved five tobacco companies since they have broken state child-abuse laws (Lasn 161). This informs us that the individual create a change within their community. With this, I could act spontaneously against cigarettes being smoked in public. One way is to support the smoke-free campus proposal. If people complain that it isn’t fair that they can’t smoke on campus, I will exclaim that it is fair that people can receive lung cancer from someone else’s action.

Works Cited
Diamond, Jared M. Collapse How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking, 2005. Print.
Lasn, Kalle. Culture Jam: The Uncooling of America. New York: Eagle Brook, 1999. Print.